Mandatory Counseling: Clinical Beneficence or Malevolence?

Autor/in	Amada, Gerald
Titel	Mandatory Counseling: Clinical Beneficence or Malevolence?
Quelle	In: Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 24 (2010) 4, S.284-294 (11 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	8756-8225
Schlagwörter	Ethics; College Students; School Counseling; Behavior Problems; School Counselors; Counselor Role; Student Rights; Administrator Role; Student Behavior + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ethik; Collegestudent; School counselling; Pädagogische Beratung; School counselor; Beratungslehrer; Pädagogischer Berater; Student behaviour; Schülerverhalten
Abstract	Mandatory counseling is a widespread and commonly accepted practice on college campuses throughout the nation. This practice bestirs heated controversy and ethical challenges when college administrators require students to undergo counseling in instances of misconduct that pose little danger to self or others. Apparently many counselors actively and approvingly undertake mandatory therapy with students; others take exception and decline to undertake involuntary counseling; and still others acquiesce by undertaking mandatory counseling with students despite their ethical objections to this coercive clinical practice. This article will highlight the rationales for ethical objections to mandatory counseling. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10