Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Yamamoto, Masami |
---|---|
Titel | The Tendency of Educational Thought of "The Ancient Studies" in the Edo Confucianism: A Focus on the Thought Differences between Ito Jinsai and Ogyu Sorai |
Quelle | In: Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54 (2022) 7, S.1014-1021 (8 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0013-1857 |
DOI | 10.1080/00131857.2021.1914583 |
Schlagwörter | Confucianism; Educational Philosophy; Educational History; Classification; Genealogy; Educational Theories; Ethics; Interpersonal Relationship; Asian Culture; Foreign Countries; Japan; China Konfuzianismus; Bildungsphilosophie; Erziehungsphilosophie; History of education; Bildungsgeschichte; Classification system; Klassifikation; Klassifikationssystem; Ahnenforschung; Genealogie; Educational theory; Theory of education; Bildungstheorie; Ethik; Interpersonal relation; Interpersonal relations; Interpersonelle Beziehung; Zwischenmenschliche Beziehung; Ausland |
Abstract | Traditionally, the genealogy of Edo Confucianism, that is, Confucianism reinterpreted and reconstructed in the Tokugawa period, has been classified into the Chu-Hsi, Wang Yang-ming, Ancient, and Eclectic schools. These classifications are based on the most representative Confucian theories in the Tokugawa period and are useful for understanding their genealogy. However, when we try to capture the substance of Confucian thought from the interest of "education," it is very difficult to understand the differences of each school's educational thought based on this classification. For example, according to the above classification of Confucian theories, the Jinsai and Sorai schools are also included in the Ancient school. However, it is no exaggeration to say that both educational ideas are completely different. In this study, although both Jinsai and Sorai are classified as Ancient schools, I will clarify how their educational theories are structured and how their contents are different. This study examines the content of Confucian thought from the perspective of "education." I hope that the discussion will open up the possibility of a more precise understanding of the "educational thought" of Edo Confucianism. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |